Friday, February 11, 2011

Potential Wikipedia Content

We could edit this page:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_discrimination and elaborate on the legal section.  Maybe talk about what reasonable traffic management means and what it isn’t.

^Going off the above:
“Upon reviewing the record, we conclude that the definition of reasonable network management should provide greater clarity regarding the standard used to gauge reasonableness, expressly account for technological differences among networks that may affect reasonable network management, and omit elements that do not relate directly to network management functions and are therefore better handled elsewhere in the rules—for example, measures to prevent the transfer of unlawful content. 255 We therefore adopt the following definition of reasonable network management:
A network management practice is reasonable if it is appropriate and tailored to
achieving a legitimate network management purpose, taking into account the particular
network architecture and technology of the broadband Internet access service.
Legitimate network management purposes include: ensuring network security and integrity,
including by addressing traffic that is harmful to the network; 256 addressing traffic that is
unwanted by end users (including by premise operators), such as by providing services or
capabilities consistent with an end user’s choices regarding parental controls or security
capabilities; 257 and reducing or mitigating the effects of congestion on the network. 258 The term “particular network architecture and technology” refers to the differences across access platforms such as cable, DSL, satellite, and fixed wireless.”
- http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2010/db1223/FCC-10-201A1.pdf
-- Paragraph 82 on page 48.http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fcc.gov%2FDaily_Releases%2FDaily_Business%2F2010%2Fdb1223%2FFCC-10-201A1.pdf&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNE5L2SbRBk7aeaPFr7ktDfsOJCj6g

Friday, February 4, 2011

The Controversy

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2007/11/the-comcast-net-neutrality-controversy-a-discussion

- found using Google
- The Heritage Foundation is a public policy research institution
- privately funded

The controversy regarding net neutrality is that consumers believe that it is in their best interest for the internet to remain neutral while the ISPs want to maximize their profits.  The ISP's claim that they should be free to manage their networks however they want since they are the ones paying to maintain them.  Consumers on the other hand believe that ISP's need to be restricted in what they can and cannot do on their networks so that they are not unfairly discriminating against certain traffic.

This came to a head when Comcast was caught throttling bit torrent traffic and was told to stop by the FCC.  This eventually lead to a legal battle in which the FCC was told that they do not have the authority to regulate what Comcast can do.